Religious Healing Or Spiritual Malpractice?

Christians who suffer from chronic illnesses need to be aware of the fact that there is an alternative source for healing, one that does not conform to the knowledge or pattern of this world. The source of this spirituality is God. But there is a problem. Millions of Christians are being stripped of the gift of non-secular healing by non-secular malpractice. If you are new to this sacred and life-changing medicine and how it can help you, you can check it out on

A few Christian traditions (doctrines), maintain that the time of miracle healing, nonsecular therapeutic, and whichever other name it is referred to, has ended. These traditions say that enough time was given for divine therapeutic, oil anointing and the laying of hands. It is not surprising that this kind of teaching may cause confusion, sickness, and other suffering.

Individuals who assert that God doesn’t intervene in this world via spiritual therapeutic need to question themselves. This claim was made by Satan or God. If He is the source, then His will be done. What if this educating was not from God? Let’s suppose Satan is whispering in the ear of man that God has completed non secular healing. What happens next? What happens if you believe and train in such a doctrine

This kind of doctrine, and Church leaders who espouse it, will be dependable in denying many chronically ill Christians non secular healing. All Church clergy, elders, pastors, as well as pastors, are responsible for the spiritual oversight of their flocks. Their teachings have grave implications.

Religious Malpractice:

Canon Mark Pearson, the author of Christian Therapeutic stated it this way: “To keep the ministry of Healing from God’s Persons simply because it transpires not to want Church leaders in the given congregation is as much as spiritual malpractice as it can become medical malpractice for a Clinic to refuse to care for heart attacks because the most popular staff members only care about pneumonia.”

Spiritual malpractice is a serious offense, as those who instruct will be held responsible (James 3:1). Consider believing in the many people who could have died before their time due to the fact that they believed God doesn’t heal.

Today’s Church is only a shadow from the divine influence it once savored. It is due largely to an unclean spirit that whispered in the ear of men that God is not at the healing enterprise. It may be a lie within a father of lies.

Confusion is the result:

Many Church leaders insist that healing should be instantaneous. It is this which is often called a miracle. God’s Word doesn’t limit religious therapeutic to being instantaneous. The term “miracle”, however, simply means that there has been supernatural or divine intervention. All healing is supernatural and divine in its nature (Exodus fifteen.26).

This view that spiritual therapy should be immediate for it to be a miracle led many Christians to give up their faith in God to heal completely. They cause: Very few people are immediately healed from long-term illnesses. Any therapeutic should therefore be done by physical means other than God’s intervention. It is possible to see the fallacy in this.

What kind of therapy could there be without God’s direct intervention? God’s Holy Phrase reveals that God is Yehovahrapha, God our healer. Imagine for a second that God is turning His back to healing the sick.

It is possible to become unwell from illness. Your health professionals inform you that they have no other options. It’s not possible to survive. This is a terrible picture. The reason you are not being helped by the health professionals isn’t because they don’t know how to help you. But God is.

Buddy, this is what can happen quite a few times daily in churches all over the country: Churches transform the ill within the body of Christ and out onto the surrounding environment. God hasn’t forgotten His little children; church buildings have lost God as our healer.

Peter answered that after the regulation’s instructors wanted to know by which energy or identify the Apostle Peter, Peter administered non-secular therapeutic treatment to a disabled person.

“It is by Jesus Christ of Nazareth’s name, whom you crucified, but whom God raised from the dead, that you see this man standing before you heal… Salvation can be found in no other person, for there is no other name in heaven by which we can be saved. – Functions four:10-12, (NIV).

Peter did not make any distinction in salvation or therapeutic for the man, as both were found in the same place: the dying, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ (the Bible). Even though Peter didn’t believe the men, they still understood his claim. Why can’t we believe him? Peter explained to this man that he was healed because he (Peter), while undoubtedly an Apostle, is among a find group of adult males. It was due to the therapeutic ability of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

No Comments

Post a Comment